Wednesday, November 22, 2006

Article I found appalling: We don't track them!?!?

Who's Counting the Dead in Iraq?
by Helen Thomas

Remember the enemy body counts during the Vietnam War? Some of those U.S. tabulations were highly exaggerated in an effort to show gains on the battlefield.

Well, we don't do that anymore.

The Pentagon has meticulously reported the American fatality toll in Iraq, now up to 286. That number includes 183 deaths from hostile fire since the start of the war. It also includes 148 dead since May 1 when President Bush declared the end of major combat operations. A Pentagon spokesman said that 1,105 U.S. service personnel have been wounded since the war began.

That kind of numerical precision doesn't apply throughout Iraq. Trying to find the death count among Iraqis has proved to be mission impossible.

I asked Pentagon officials: ''How many Iraqis have been killed in this war?'' The answers were given ''on background'' -- meaning that the Pentagon spokesmen requested anonymity. The spokesmen were honest. They clearly were following orders from the policymakers when they replied that the Iraqi fatality toll was simply not our concern.

The reply to my first Pentagon call was: ``We don't track them (Iraqi dead).''

Weeks later I pursued the question and was told by a Defense Department official: ''They don't count. They are not important,'' meaning the casualty figures.

I later asked for an explanation of why there has been no attempt to find out the number of Iraqi war dead. A Pentagon officer patiently responded: ``In combat operations, we have objectives. We don't have an objective to kill people. Our objective was to remove Saddam Hussein from Iraq.''

''If the Iraqis laid down their arms,'' he added, ''there was no problem. But if we have to go in by force to kill them, the numbers don't make a difference. It's not something we are concerned with.'' He said that U.S. forces used precision weapons to minimize the casualties.

''We achieved our military objective. We did not count'' the enemy dead, he said. ``It would be difficult at best to determine who was killed when dealing with soldiers on the ground.''

Various news organizations have come up with estimates of Iraqi dead that range from 1,700 to 3,000 persons. The heavy tonnage of bombs dropped on Iraq probably raised the civilian death toll higher.

An official at the U.S. Army Center of Military History acknowledged that the question of enemy fatalities ``is a bit sensitive to our people. We just don't face up to how many people were lost.''

Books at the history center refer to 50,000 Americans killed in World War I and some 250,000 Americans in World War II. Germany lost 1.8 million soldiers in World War I, and, as our archenemy in World War II, lost about 3.25 million people.

We do know, however, that in the Vietnam War 58,198 Americans died -- and many thousands more Vietnamese.

White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan was asked this week whether President Bush knows how many people were killed and wounded in Iraq -- ''not just Americans but the total people killed and wounded in Iraq since the beginning of the war.'' He dodged the question, simply saying that Bush is ``well aware of the sacrifices that our troops have made and the sacrifices that their families are making with our troops over there in Iraq.''

On March 18, two days before the U.S. invasion, Barbara Bush had an interview with ABC-TV's Diane Sawyer.

''Why should we hear about body bags and deaths and how many, what day it's gonna happen?'' Mrs. Bush declared. ''It's not relevant. So why should I waste my beautiful mind on something like that?'' Maybe she is right, but I don't think so.
(Lady's answer to this is, "WHAT MIND?")

If we do not know or care about the human cost of war for the winners and losers, America will be forever diminished in the eyes of the world.

Copyright 1996-2003 Knight Ridder.

Although there are similar articles regarding the hundreds of thousands of 'innocent' Iraqi's slaughtered, this mentality and the same in articles that Americans have shoved aside as being, 'just a part of war', a reminder to all those who (supposedly) researched their candidate and shamelessly voted for this tyrant the SECOND time is followed by a question: WHERE ARE ALL YOU COWARDS NOW AND HOW CAN YOU DEFEND THIS?

Legally, we have no standing President and if more did their research, they would know this. Bush was appointed and literally stole his way in twice. And Americans just sat back and watched it happen.
We could learn a valuable lesson from other countries who have began revolutions and demanded a second election AND a paper trail to ensure their choice for a leader was elected. They did such a thing and won.

I visit sites for the Right and am still appalled by their 'stand by their man' mentality and I've always believed that if there were executions on the White House lawn ordered by this tyrant, he would find a way to justify them and his (bushwacked followers, brainwashed faces without souls) would back him, 100%.

The purpose of my posting this articles is 'when is anything of importance' going to matter to the people who CLAIM they love their country? I get tired of these 'nice-nice' posts and the simple 'one-liner' comments stating their disagreement or not, but then doing nothing when they leave their home.

How many so-called concerned Americans have joined forces with other Activists to fight to restore what is left of this country? How many so-called Americans have continually signed petitions, handed out flyers, started a grassroots movement in your county to effect change? How many so-called Americans have contacted their Representatives to have your voice heard, since this is the only way they can possibly know what the American people are thinking, what they truly care about?

I'd like to hear of the ways you personally have joined forces to protest the trampling of our Constitution. I know there are concerned Americans and I ask you to share how you have contributed to salvaging this great country.

It takes ONE person to start a Revolution and many will follow. And yes, there are many revolutions taking place, and that are making a difference.

Blogging is not just posting the latest news. Blogging is interacting with others to effect change. Whether that change be, reading of someones success in gardening and then taking it a step further by letting other gardeners know so their crops etc, will be more productive, thus becoming a contribution to society.

What are we leaving our children/grand children? What will they remember about this generation? Will it be that we failed as a country to demand the truth, to demand others hold ones not speaking the truth, accountable?
Do we not hold each other accountable for our wrongdoings? Do we not demand truth and loyalty from our children?

All of the years I have been blogging and listening to the knee-jerk insults from the Right, as I expect, because they are not interested in facts, they are not interested in exchanging ideas for adopting a plan of action for this country they claim to love, although they have always been invited to comment, if they were able to show respect. I've yet to see this become reality.

Once in awhile I do the 'unspeakable' concerning blogging; I ask for insight, opinions, truth...I will probably remain confused and bewildered as to why others find it so intimidating to speak their mind. But, this is who I am and once in awhile someone surprises me and shows up with a sincere and caring comment.
I don't hold my breath, though.

Interacting effects change and the powers that be, in this case being other bloggers, if they were to all unite, I believe the skies would open.
But, first we need open minds!

Peace to all my fellow Americans.

No comments: